The 100-year life

THE 100-YEAR LIFE

“…millions of people can look forward to a long life (100+) …. how will you make the most of this gift?” This quote, from the book “THE 100-YEAR LIFE” by Lynda Gratton and Andrew Scott, poses one of the many thought-provoking questions they raise to challenge people of all ages and walks of life to rethink the normal stereotypes for older age. If today’s generation, at least in the UK, are likely to survive to 100+ years of age, their issues and prospects are very different to those of previous generations.

This question seems to be barely discussed in public, and yet it is fundamental for the future of the young. Recognition that people are living longer manifests itself in the government lengthening of the retirement age, and the age when the state pension kicks in, often met with cries of woe, which indicates a negative attitude to the opportunity of longer life. There is an element of recognition that, if people want an older age of any quality, they will need the resources and so probably in most cases people will have to work for longer; perhaps into their 80s. The work available at that age may well be different to that available when an individual is in their 40s or 50s, which in turn may differ from when in their 20s.  But Governmental reaction on the pension front is not the real story. That real story is one of resetting attitude and change.

Longevity of itself is not a good or bad thing. It is a measure of time not quality. In old age to be confined to bed, or in any other way, may be very unattractive to many. On the other hand, longevity where aspirations exist and are fulfilled, there is activity and real human relationships being enjoyed and developed, with decent health, is a gift to be cherished.

The book emphasises the need to consider the potential stages of life and, with an open mind, rethink the standard stages of life when life expectancy was 70. In earlier years, after school/university/ early training, maybe it is unnecessary to make a lifelong career choice? Instead the 20s can be used for exploring, provided enough cash can be earnt to survive through simple but not career defining work. Some youngsters are already perceiving that time spent experimenting, getting life experience, is time well spent. Real earning power can come later? Can this work? Will employers look at things the same way? A new debate is needed engaging employers, government, young and old, and parents who particularly need an open mind for their offspring, so that proper planning is acceptable and encouraged, and not just financial planning. A married life of 70 years for example is very different to one of 25. The book “The100-Year Life” is a good start for anyone interested in this essential theme.